Skip to main content
· 9/17/1991

Bloch v. Berkshire Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 585 So. 2d 1137
  • 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9088
  • 1991 WL 181485

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that dispute over insurance contract was governed by New York law where contract was delivered to claim in New York, where he resided
  • applying New York law to an insurance policy because the insured resided and was covered in New York
  • “As to the choice of law issue, we agree with the trial court that this insurance contract, which was delivered to [plaintiff] in New York where he then resided, was regulated by New York, rather than Florida, law.”
  • “As to the choice of law issue, we agree with the trial court that this insurance contract, which was delivered to Bloch in New York where he then resided, was regulated by New York, rather than Florida, law.”
  • “As to the choice of law issue, we agree with the trial court that this insurance contract, which was delivered to [plaintiff] in New York where he then resided, was regulated by New York, rather than Florida, law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nesbitt, Cope and Gersten

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.