Blizzard v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing and abolishing the “net recovery” rule in context of article 2226 claims for attorney’s fees, the predecessor to section 38.001
• discussing and abolishing the “net recovery” rule in context of article 2226 claims for attorney’s fees, the predecessor to section 38.001
• “the evidence is undisputed that Nationwide had already paid more than the sum found by the jury and was entitled to a credit for those payments”
• jury finding of no damages for pain and suffering is proper when the indicia of injury and damages are more subjective than objective
• \the evidence is undisputed that Nationwide had already paid more than the sum found by the jury and was entitled to a credit for those payments\
• “the evidence is undisputed that Nationwide had already paid more than the sum found by the jury and was entitled to a credit for those payments”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).