Skip to main content
· 6/23/1982

Bliss v. Ach

Citations

  • 56 N.Y.2d 995
  • 453 N.Y.S.2d 633
  • 439 N.E.2d 349
  • 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3554

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that dismissal of an unjust enrichment claim was inappropriate because the claim was predicated on conduct outside of the contract
  • holding actionable as fiduciary breach allegedly negligent advice pertaining to fund asset allocation and investment objectives
  • identifying potential fiduciary status where defendants allegedly “held themselves out as experienced in the field of investment consulting and management,” and unsophisticated plaintiffs relied on that expertise
  • relying on another’s superior expertise or knowledge will establish a fiduciary relationship
  • relying on another's superior expertise or knowledge will establish a fiduciary relationship
  • plaintiffs allegation that the defendants “held themselves out as experienced in the field of investment consulting and management” weighed toward finding fiduciary relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.