Bliss Clearing Niagara, Inc. v. Midwest Brake Bond Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Ajllowing otherwise displaced tort claims to proceed on the basis that the information may not rise to the level of a trade secret would defeat the purpose of the UTSA.”
• allowing otherwise displaced tort claims to proceed on the basis that the information may not rise to the level of a trade secret would defeat the purpose of the UTSA
• claims preempted by MUTSA to the extent the allegations are the same as trade secret misappropriation allegations
• although plaintiff alleged wrongful retention and use of blueprints and drawings, focus of the claim was upon trade secrets
• finding claim for tortious interference not preempted by UTSA
• tortious interference with contract and unfair competition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).