Blincoe v. Luessenhop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Res ipsa loquitur was inapplicable in a medical malpractice action brought by a patient who had suffered a cerebellar infarct after undergoing certain treatment procedures because the cerebellar infarct could be suffered as a result of a cause unrelated to the treatment procedures
• insufficient evidence to establish a causal link
• insufficient evidence to establish a causal link
• \res ipsa loquitur is inapplicable\
• “res ipsa loquitur is inapplicable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).