Skip to main content

Blige v. State

Citations

  • 264 Ga. 166
  • 441 S.E.2d 752
  • 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 1328
  • 1994 Ga. LEXIS 291

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “evidence which goes to a witness’ credibility is not relevant unless produced to attack the credibility of a witness, or to rehabilitate credibility when it has been attacked”
  • evidence of similar transactions supported finding that evidence was overwhelming, rendering trial court’s error harmless
  • evidence of similar transactions supported finding that evidence was overwhelming, rendering trial court's error harmless
  • although an expert hired by one party could be subpoenaed for trial by the opposing party on the same basis as any other witness, the fact of the expert’s original employment by the first party was irrelevant and could be prejudicial
  • bolstering allowed if witness’ credibility attacked

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.