Blickman Turkus v. Mf Downtown Sunnyvale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a party claiming attorney fees “must ‘establish that the opposing party actually would have been entitled to receive them if he or she had been the prevailing party.’ ”
• “[A] prevailing signatory defendant is entitled to fees only if the losing nonsignatory plaintiff would have been entitled to its fees if [he] had prevailed.” (second alteration in original) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• one element of fraud is justifiable reliance
• element of fraud is justifiable reliance.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).