Blevins v. Blevins

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 297

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to find that wife in a divorce action was \voluntarily underemployed\ so as to warrant imputing additional income to wife for purposes of calculating spousal and child support. Neither did the trial court abuse its discretion by declining to award husband a portion of wife's earnings deposited into an account that husband had stipulated was to be wife's separate property, or by ordering husband to pay a significant portion of wife's attorney's fees based on the parties' disparate incomes. Finally, trial court did not deny husband due process through its rulings that excluded irrelevant, cumulative, and/or not-proffered evidence. Judgment affirmed.