Blessum v. HOWARD CTY. BD. OF SUP'RS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the order extending time to file post-trial motions was valid . . . under rule 247, defendant’s post-trial motions filed thirty days after verdict were timely and notice of appeal therefrom was timely, giving us jurisdiction of this appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).