Blazy v. Tenet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that individuals have a privacy interest in “protecting the fact that their names appear” in CIA Employee Review Panel files
• dismissing a Privacy Act claim for failure to exhaust when the plaintiff had not followed agency regulations for how to submit a Privacy Act request, sent a letter requesting documents to the wrong individual, and “nowhere mention[ed] the Privacy Act”
• dismissing a Privacy Act claim for failure to exhaust when the plaintiff had not followed agency regulations for how to submit a Privacy Act request, sent a letter requesting documents to the wrong individual, and “nowhere mention[ed] the Privacy Act”
• “Even where a requester is not entitled to a document under the Privacy Act, he or she may still be entitled to it under the FOIA. . . . Document requests therefore must be analyzed under both Acts.”
• providing a detailed factual summary
• providing a detailed factual summary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).