Blazina v. Bouchard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that standing for a damages claim satisfies Article III standing with respect to other forms of relief \involv[ing] the same operative facts and legal theory\
• holding that loss of companionship claims can be asserted even after a child reaches the age of majority
• holding that a damages claim satisfies Article III standing with respect to other forms of relief “involv[ing] the same operative facts and legal theory”
• holding that a damages claim satisfies Article III standing with respect to other forms of relief “involv[ing] the same operative facts and legal theory”
• holding that standing for a damages claim satisfies Article III standing with respect to other forms of relief “involv[ing] the same operative facts and legal theory”
• holding that victim's children \were not directly subjected to the excessive use of state force and therefore cannot maintain personal causes of action under section 1983 in reliance on this Fourth Amendment theory\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).