Blazer-Robbin, Inc. v. Boken

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]hile a PMA review is considerably more rigorous and detailed than the premarket notification process at issue in Medtronic, it is, in fact, no more ‘specific’ a requirement.”
• claims not preempted because PMA process is not specific federal regulation
• claims not preempted because PMA process is not specific federal regulation
• claims not preempted because PMA process is not specific federal regulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).