Blaylock v. First American Title Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to extend the filed rate doctrine under Washington law to claims by homeowners that they obtained title insurance from insurers who paid illegal kickbacks and inducements
• declining to extend the filed rate doctrine under Washington law to claims by homeowners that they obtained title insurance from insurers who paid illegal kickbacks and inducements
• finding the agency did not specifically permit the challenged conduct because the conduct was “not ‘required or permitted to be done’ under the Insurance Code”
• “Although the rates are submitted, and the Commissioner has 15 days in which review could occur before the rates go into effect, the Code does not actually mandate review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).