Blankenship v. Liberty Life Assur. Co. of Boston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming upward deviation from 20 Treasury Bill rate where substantial evidence established plaintiff had to rely on savings for 21 expenses that otherwise would have been invested for a greater rate of return
• upholding award of 10,01% interest to compensate for loss of investment income based on similar evidence, stating the “factual findings are supported by the record, and are adequate to satisfy the ‘substantial evidence’ requirement”
• postjudgment interest rate 26 7 27 Because we are affirming the bankruptcy court’s nondischargeability judgment under § 523(a)(2)(A) we decline to 28 address Breliant’s alternate claim for relief under § 523(a)(6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).