Blankenship v. Huesman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although the defendant violated a duty prescribed by the Indiana Code, he sufficiently rebutted the presumption of negligence, and the trial court's judgment was not contrary to law
• holding that although the defendant violated a duty prescribed by the Indiana Code, he sufficiently rebutted the presumption of negligence, and the trial court's judgment was not contrary to law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).