Blankenship v. City of Charleston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that ”[b]ecause the policy did not extend insurance coverage to the type of project giving rise to the injuiy in question,” lower court correctly found no duty to defend or indemnify
• “Determination of the proper coverage of an insurance contract when the facts are not in dispute is a question of law.”
• “[A]n equally important provision of the general policy is the cautionary introductory statement that ‘[v]arious provisions in this policy restrict coverage [and one has to] [r]ead the entire policy carefully to determine rights, duties and what is not covered.’”
• “[A]n equally important provision of the general policy is the cautionary introductory statement that ‘[v]arious provisions in this policy restrict coverage [and one has to] [r]ead the entire policy carefully to determine rights, duties and what is not covered.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).