Skip to main content
· 9/6/1944

Blankenship v. Childress

Citations

  • 183 Va. 13
  • 31 S.E.2d 302
  • 1944 Va. LEXIS 125

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing between standing of defendant to object to summons issued to another person, and “the question of the finality and hence of the appealability of the order refusing to quash the summons”
  • dismissing appeal of order denying motions to quash grand-jury subpoenas and compelling compliance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gregory

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.