Skip to main content
· 8/5/1964

Blankenship v. Celebrezze

Citations

  • 232 F. Supp. 229
  • 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7586

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[F]or sanctions to be appropriate, it is a necessary, but insufficient, condition that the sought-after evidence actually existed and was destroyed.”
  • “In the absence of bad faith or other sufficiently egregious conduct, it cannot be inferred from the conduct of the spoliator that the evidence would even have been harmful to him.”
  • in the context of discovery, “relevance” is “‘an extremely broad concept.’” (citing cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Christie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.