Blankenship v. Cabinet for Human Resources

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court ruling of no willfulness despite defendant’s knowledge of the patent and failure to seek advice of counsel
• “[T]he focus of inquiry is on the circumstances and status of those harmed and not merely on whether the acts were committed during the disorder.”
• “trade secret law is intended to maintain and promote standards of commercial ethics and fair dealing”
• interpretation of treaty language by the Department of State is “entitled to considerable deference”
• “the policies expressed in the federal antitrust laws will override any agreement in contravention of those policies, regardless of the agreement’s legality under private contract law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).