Blankenbaker v. Great Central Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment because a tire and rim did not constitute an automobile for the purposes of hit- and-run coverage in an uninsured motorist provision and because there was no evidence of a causal connection between another car and the tire and rim
• no recovery where plaintiffs were injured when insured’s camper-bus struck a truck tire and rim on the roadway because plaintiffs failed to provide evidence to establish a causal connection between a motor vehicle and the tire and rim assembly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).