Skip to main content
· 10/30/1996

Blanken v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction

Citations

  • 944 F. Supp. 1359
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16540
  • 72 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 887
  • 1996 WL 650941

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing that “[p]rison safety and security are penological concerns of the highest order[,]” in the context of considering a regulation directed to a prison employee.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: George C. Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.