Bland v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in a trial to the court for grand larceny, after the prosecution rested the trial judge brought to the district attorney’s attention the fact that the value of the stolen goods had not been proved, and then permitted the prosecution to reopen its case to present such proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Adler
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1981-05-04· cited 515×
• Polk v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1972-04-10· cited 15×
• Aceva Technologies, LLC v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2013-09-18· cited 11×
• McClendon v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1973-07-09· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Rochester v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1971-05-24· cited 6×