Skip to main content

Bland v. State

Citations

  • 395 So. 2d 164

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The trial court must be apprised of the basis for the objection with sufficient particularity to allow an informed decision to be made on the particular legal issues involved.\
  • appellate argument that the prosecution was improperly introducing evidence of separate and unrelated criminal offenses committed by the accused was not preserved where, at the trial level, counsel objected to the evidence as \prejudicial\ or \immaterial\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.