Bland v. Kennamer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[wjhether to remand or dismiss is a matter normally left to the discretion of the district court”
• noting that 28 U.S.C. § 1367 “essentially codifies” pendant jurisdiction as outlined in Mine Workers
• noting that in some cases “some factors will weigh so strongly in one direction as to be dispositive”
• noting that judicial economy and 4 convenience at the motion to dismiss stage do not favor the federal court exercising supplemental jurisdiction over remaining state law claims following dismissal of the federal claims
• affirming the dismissal of a complaint alleging multiple victims and numerous predicate acts
• finding dismissal appropriate where “the district court has invested virtually no time on any of the issues left to be resolved in [the] case [and where] there has been no trial ... and little analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).