Skip to main content
· 8/13/2002

Bland v. Dukes

Citations

  • 97 S.W.3d 133
  • 2002 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 681
  • 2002 WL 1905301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the judgment in McConnell was deemed facially void because the defendant was sentenced under the 1982 Act and the forty percent release eligibility status did not exist under the 1989 Act
  • upholding aggravated robbery sentence, despite sentence length falling in range above petitioner’s range classification
  • a petitioner is not entitled to habeas relief on issues regarding an offender’s range classification because the issue is non-jurisdictional and is a proper basis for plea negotiations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tipton, Smith, Witt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.