Blanco de Belbruno v. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the remedy when the Board improperly affirms a case under its summary affirmance procedures, for example, by “allowing] a non-harmless error to slip through,” is judicial review of the immigration judge’s decision
• noting that “how [the Attorney General] allocates those resources to address the burden of increasing claims is a calculation that courts should be loathe to second guess”
• immigration judge’s denial of asylum upheld “unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary”
• applying Chevron to BIA interpretations of INS regulations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).