Blanck v. Waukesha County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Postponing review until after conviction would undermine the purpose of the double jeopardy clause . . . .”
• “Postponing review until after conviction would undermine the purpose of the double jeopardy clause . . . .”
• “[T]his court can consider Mr. Blanck’s double jeopardy claim prior to trial, so long as he has exhausted his state remedies.”
• “In most cases courts will not consider claims that can be raised at trial and in subsequent state proceedings.”
• “While not explicitly required by § 2241(c)(3), the interests of comity have caused courts to apply the doctrine of exhaustion of state remedies to pretrial habeas petitions.”
• “[T]he interests of comity have caused courts to apply the doctrine of exhaustion of state remedies to pretrial habeas petitions.” (citing Neville v. Cavanagh, 611 F.2d 673, 675 (7th Cir. 1979)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).