Blanchard v. Wilt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Hilbert \must be limited to its own factual situation\
• consent verdict was not legal equivalent of judgment entered in action after adversary proceeding and thus, entry and satisfaction of consent verdict did not preclude present action
• agreement to hold party harmless “from any further liability in connection with damages” caused by fire that was subject matter of the lawsuit was construed as a release since it was received in exchange for consideration and discharged party from liability in action
• agreement to hold party harmless \from any further liability in connection with damages\ caused by fire that was subject matter of the lawsuit was construed as a release since it was received in exchange for consideration and discharged party from liability in action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).