Skip to main content
· 4/15/1835

Blanchard v. Cole

Citations

  • 8 La. 160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that plaintiff employees were collaterally estopped from reliti- gating, as against defendant, whether defendant’s subsidiary violated state human rights law when earlier litigation resulted in jury verdict in favor of subsidiary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.