Skip to main content
· 7/1/1861

Blanchard v. Beideman

Citations

  • 18 Cal. 261

Syllabus

<p>The liability of owners of property in San Francisco for assessments made by the city authorities for repairing streets, depends on the statute, and only inures after the steps required by the statute have been taken.</p> <p>Under the Consolidation Act of 1856 for San Francisco, and the Act of 1859 amendatory thereof, the Board of Supervisors have no power to order a contract for planking, paving, piling or repaving a street which has been once paved, piled, etc., except in the instance given in section fifty-three as amended by section ten of the Act of 1859.</p> <p>In other cases not within this exception, where the planking or paving of a street or sidewalk needs local repairs, the Supervisors cannot authorize a contract to be made by the Superintendent of Streets for such repairs; but the proceeding must be by notice to the owner, etc., of the property, according to section fifty-six as amended by section twelve of the Act of 1859.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[i]n a proceeding to obtain an accounting, the complainant is not obliged to show how much is due, provided he avers facts sufficient to indicate that something will be found to be due him by the defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.