Blakley v. Schlumberger Technology Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not err in considering the EEOC charge in ruling on motion to dismiss
• ruling that because appellant “ha[d] not actually challenged the district court’s conclusion that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction . . . she ha[d] waived any argument to this effect on appeal”
• holding the appellant waived a challenge to the district court's conclusion that she failed to exhaust her administrative remedies because she did not make any supporting arguments on appeal
• explaining that courts may consider an EEOC charge at the pleading stage without converting a motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment
• explaining that courts may consider an EEOC charge at the pleading stage without converting a motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment
• explaining that courts may consider an EEOC charge at the pleading stage without converting a motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).