Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman, Inc. v. Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘[u]nder an unrestricted submission . . . courts will not review the evidence considered by the arbitrators nor will they review the award for errors of law or fact’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[i]t is undisputed that the plaintiffs submission to arbitration was unrestricted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).