Skip to main content
· 6/27/1995

Blakemore v. Pekay

Citations

  • 895 F. Supp. 972
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9228
  • 1995 WL 469725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that limitations period ran from date of the garnishment action, rather than the date of the underlying debt collection action
  • \The venue provision of the FDCPA was designed to limit the ability of debt collectors to file debt collection actions in courts inconvenient to the debtor.\
  • attorney regularly collected consumer debts when he had filed over 1,200 collection actions in the last year and had been elected to the state Creditors Bar Association
  • wage deduction orders are “legal action[s] on a debt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.