Blakely v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because plain reading of the distinct, unambiguous policy language expressly defined the limited alternatives of the “cost of repair or replacement,” the policy did not provide for additional recovery by insureds of any diminished value

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).