Blake v. Spears

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming order of incarceration where trial court gave litigant opportunity to purge himself of contempt and subsequently held a hearing as to whether the party had met the purge requirements and whether any failure to do so was wilful
• “OCGA § 24-10-22 (b) (1) gives the trial court discretion upon timely motion to quash or modify such a subpoena if it is unreasonable and oppressive. This standard is tested by the peculiar facts arising from the subpoena itself and other proper sources.” (punctuation omitted)
• “OCGA § 24-10-22 (b) (1) gives the trial court discretion upon timely motion to quash or modify such a subpoena if it is unreasonable and oppressive. This standard is tested by the peculiar facts arising from the subpoena itself and other proper sources.” (punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).