Skip to main content
· 3/2/1885

Blake v. San Francisco

Citations

  • 113 U.S. 679
  • 5 S. Ct. 692
  • 28 L. Ed. 1070
  • 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1719

Syllabus

<p>The second claim in the reissued patent of September 18, 1877, to Charles E. Blake, assignee of the administratrix of Thomas H. Bailey, deceased, for an improvement in relief valves for water cylinders, is for a combination of an automatic valve with, a pinhole and pin to effect the desired object; and, as automatic valves had been previously used for that purpose in ■ other combinations, it is not infringed by a combination of such a valve with a screw, sleeve or cap to-, effect the same objects.</p> <p>The adaptation of an automatic valve, a device known and in use before the plaintiff’s patent, to a steam fire engine, is not such invention as will sustain a patent.</p> <p>Where the public has acquired the right to use a machine or device for a particular purpose, it has the right to use it for all like purposes to which it can be applied, unless a new and different result is obtained by a new application of it.</p>

Judges: Woods

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.