Blake v. Professional Travel Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that this court’s review of a ruling on a forum non conveniens motion “does not allow the trial court the margin of error that the term ‘discretion’ ordinarily signifies”
• “[T]he inquiry is not [w]hether the District of Columbia is the best forum for this litigation, but rather whether the District has so little to do with this case that its courts should decline to hear it.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[T]he inquiry is not [w]hether the District of Columbia is the best forum for this litigation, but rather whether the District has so little to do with this case that its courts should decline to hear it.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).