Blake v. First Physicians Cor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 104(a) does not confer any added discretion to exclude admissible evidence and finding that “[w]here, as here, a piece of evidence rests upon a proper foundation, Rule 104(a
• finding prejudicial error when the trial court withheld evidence from the jury on matters that were vital to the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).