· 5/23/1932
Blake v. District Court of United States for Southern District of California
Citations
- 59 F.2d 78
- 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 3316
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- exercising discretion to correct plain error in imposing unitary assessment based on “the interests of the parties and the ends of justice”
- exercising discretion to correct plain error in imposing unitary assessment based on “the interests of the parties and the ends of justice”
- correcting as plain error the trial court’s entry of misdemeanor convictions for contempt
- correcting as plain error the trial court’s entry of misdemeanor convictions for contempt
- court plainly erred in imposing unitary assessment on judgment of contempt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilbur
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.