Skip to main content
· 5/23/1932

Blake v. District Court of United States for Southern District of California

Citations

  • 59 F.2d 78
  • 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 3316

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • exercising discretion to correct plain error in imposing unitary assessment based on “the interests of the parties and the ends of justice”
  • exercising discretion to correct plain error in imposing unitary assessment based on “the interests of the parties and the ends of justice”
  • correcting as plain error the trial court’s entry of misdemeanor convictions for contempt
  • correcting as plain error the trial court’s entry of misdemeanor convictions for contempt
  • court plainly erred in imposing unitary assessment on judgment of contempt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilbur

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.