Skip to main content
· 2/24/2014

Blake v. Connolly

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 1288
  • 188 L. Ed. 2d 316
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3492
  • 571 U.S. 1207
  • 2014 WL 684203
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1630

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that state court orders are public records and therefore the proper subject of judicial notice
  • noting that an order entered by a state court is a public record appropriate for judicial notice
  • a state court order is a public record and the appropriate subject of judicial notice
  • “The right place to propose judicial notice, once a case is in a court of appeals, is in a brief. … There’s no need to engage in motions practice, require the attention of additional appellate judges, and defer briefing.”
  • “The right place to propose judicial notice, once a case is in a court of appeals, is in a brief. … There’s no need to engage in motions practice, require the attention of additional appellate judges, and defer briefing.”
  • “The right place to propose judicial notice, once a case is in a court of appeals, is in a brief. … There’s no need to engage in motions practice, require the attention of additional appellate judges, and defer briefing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.