Skip to main content
· 7/25/2005

Blake Conyers v. Tom Abitz

Citations

  • 416 F.3d 580
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 15130
  • 2005 WL 1713392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing additional claims based on same circumstances because the claim “gains nothing by attracting additional constitutional labels”
  • dismissing claims based on same circumstances because the claim “gains nothing by attracting additional constitutional labels”
  • dismissing additional claims based on same circumstances because the claim “gains nothing by attracting additional constitutional labels”
  • dismissing claims based on same circumstances because the claim “gains nothing by attracting additional constitutional labels”
  • dismissing claims based on same circumstances because the claim “gains nothing by attracting additional constitutional labels”
  • affirming dismissal of redundant claims that “gain[] nothing by adding additional constitutional labels”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Coffey, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.