· 7/25/2005
Blake Conyers v. Tom Abitz
Citations
- 416 F.3d 580
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 15130
- 2005 WL 1713392
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing additional claims based on same circumstances because the claim “gains nothing by attracting additional constitutional labels”
- dismissing claims based on same circumstances because the claim “gains nothing by attracting additional constitutional labels”
- dismissing additional claims based on same circumstances because the claim “gains nothing by attracting additional constitutional labels”
- dismissing claims based on same circumstances because the claim “gains nothing by attracting additional constitutional labels”
- dismissing claims based on same circumstances because the claim “gains nothing by attracting additional constitutional labels”
- affirming dismissal of redundant claims that “gain[] nothing by adding additional constitutional labels”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Coffey, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.