Blaising v. Mills

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that fraud cannot be based on promises to be performed in the future
• “When a party elects to rescind the contract, a return of the parties to the status quo usually requires the party in possession to return the property received under the contract . . . .” (citation omitted)
• “undue influence destroys [the grantor’s] free agency ...”
• \undue influence destroys [the grantor's] free agency ...\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).