Blair v. Nevada Landing Partnership, RBG, LP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the IRPA supplants the common law tort of misappropriation of likeness and implicitly incorporates the one-year limitations period applicable to that tort
• concluding that Right of Publicity Act supplants common-law tort of misappropriation of likeness and implicitly incorporates 1-year limitations period applicable to that tort
• concluding that Right of Publicity Act supplants common‐law tort of misappropriation of likeness and implicitly incorporates 1‐year limitations period applicable to that tort
• holding that repeated advertisements that were not significantly changed to reach a new audience and that promoted a single product, a steakhouse, did not retrigger the statute of limitations.
• finding that “a republication of the plaintiff’s likeness can constitute a new cause of action if the publication is altered so as to reach a new audience or promote a different product”
• finding the use of the same photo was not a republication in part because it was targeted at the same audience and locations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).