Skip to main content
· 12/21/1984

Blair v. Maynard

Citations

  • 324 S.E.2d 391
  • 174 W. Va. 247
  • 1984 W. Va. LEXIS 504

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the court cannot act as “surrogate attorney” for a pro se litigant.
  • sufficiency of bill of particulars is within the sound discretion of the trial court
  • “The court should strive . . . to ensure that the diligent pro se party does not forfeit any substantial rights by inadvertent omission or mistake.”
  • “The court should strive . . . to ensure that the diligent pro se party does not forfeit any substantial rights by inadvertent omission or mistake.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGRAW

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.