· 12/21/1984
Blair v. Maynard
Citations
- 324 S.E.2d 391
- 174 W. Va. 247
- 1984 W. Va. LEXIS 504
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the court cannot act as “surrogate attorney” for a pro se litigant.
- sufficiency of bill of particulars is within the sound discretion of the trial court
- “The court should strive . . . to ensure that the diligent pro se party does not forfeit any substantial rights by inadvertent omission or mistake.”
- “The court should strive . . . to ensure that the diligent pro se party does not forfeit any substantial rights by inadvertent omission or mistake.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGRAW
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.