Skip to main content
· 7/16/1984

Blaine v. United States

Citations

  • 5 Cl. Ct. 502
  • 1984 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing dismissal of retaliation claim and holding that “chilling 9 effect” pleading element was satisfied where prisoner alleged that guard refused to serve him one 10 breakfast in retaliation for filing an inmate grievance
  • “The standard for determining whether a plaintiff has failed to 9 state a claim upon which relief can be granted under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) is the same as the 10 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) standard for failure to state a claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.