Skip to main content
· 10/21/2010

Blades v. MORGALO

Citations

  • 743 F. Supp. 2d 85
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112534
  • 2010 WL 4119236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting “increase[d] … costs or travel time” as a basis for finding prejudice
  • “The prudential standing doctrine is not jurisdictional in the manner that Article III standing is.”
  • “The prudential standing doctrine is not jurisdictional in the manner that Article III standing is.”
  • “Rule 17(a) is a means of avoiding injustice when a good faith error has been made.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justo Arenas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.