Skip to main content
· 8/24/1983

Blade v. Anaconda Aluminum Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 452 N.E.2d 1036
  • 1983 Ind. App. LEXIS 3279

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • even assuming employer intentionally pursued a course of conduct that jeopardized workers' safety, nevertheless the conduct can be characterized at most as grossly negligent or wanton; exclusive remedy is workers' compensation
  • “Although we may infer from [plaintiff]’s complaint that [defendant] intentionally pursued a course of conduct which jeopardized its worker’s safety, no facts were alleged which support an inference that [defendant] intentionally injured [the plaintiff].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robertson, Ratliff, Neal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.