· 8/24/1983
Blade v. Anaconda Aluminum Co., Inc.
Citations
- 452 N.E.2d 1036
- 1983 Ind. App. LEXIS 3279
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- even assuming employer intentionally pursued a course of conduct that jeopardized workers' safety, nevertheless the conduct can be characterized at most as grossly negligent or wanton; exclusive remedy is workers' compensation
- “Although we may infer from [plaintiff]’s complaint that [defendant] intentionally pursued a course of conduct which jeopardized its worker’s safety, no facts were alleged which support an inference that [defendant] intentionally injured [the plaintiff].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robertson, Ratliff, Neal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.