Bladdick v. Pour

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that a primary violation of the NYSHRL and the NYCHRL are necessary to support aiding-and-abetting liability
• also granting summary judgment in favor of employer on employee’s retaliation claim because employee failed to establish a prima facie case of retaliation
• “inference of discriminatory animus” weakened by fact that those responsible for terminating plaintiff were members of the protected class
• “Because the NYCHRL does not define ‘employee,’ the common law definition applies.”
• comparing NYCHRL to stricter standard under 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).