Blackwell v. State
Citations
- 76 Fla. 124
- 79 So. 731
Syllabus
<p>1. Where it is alleged in an affidavit of the defendant in a criminal case in suport of a motion for a change of venue that the defendant is odious to the people of the County, that the prejudice against him is very great, and that a fund had been subscribed to by the citizens of the County and collected by a Deputy Sheriff to employ additional counsel to assist in the .prosecution of the defendant, and where two of the attorneys f<5r the defence swear that on account of the vast and powerful Influence of the sheriff that the people of the County were greatly prejudiced against the defendants, and that the Sheriff had proclaimed his belief in the guilt of the prisoners and thereby caused the people generally to hate and despise the defendants and believe them guilty, and these allegations are not traversed by the State, it was reversible error to refuse to grant a change of venue.</p> <p>2. Where an application for a change of venue is based on the prejudice of the Judge against the defendants, no discretion is vested in the Judge to hear and determine the question of whether or not he is prejudiced.</p> <p>3. Where it is alleged in an affidavit in support of a motion for change of venue on the grounds of the prejudice of the Judge against the defendant, that the Judge “yielded to public clamor,” and called a special term of the Court a short time before the regular term of the Court would convene, and that in doing this he acted “solely at the behest of public sentiment,” and that he did this without any other and further reason than that the “people of the County demanded speedy justice,” it was reversible error to refuse the motion.</p> <p>4. Kemarks made by counsel in the presence of the Jury which would naturally tend to influence their minds to the prejudice of the defendants, when called to the attention of the Court, should be stricken from the record, and the jury admonished that they should give no consideration to such remarks, and the refusal of the C
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- prosecutorial comments regarding appellate review approved by trial judge held reversible error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browne, Ennispj, Simmons, Távlor, West, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1985-06-11· cited 2,827×
- People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court· 1964-01-07· cited 474×
- Dugger v. AdamsSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 432×
- Remus v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1923-06-30· cited 104×
- Pait v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1959-03-11· cited 83×
- Prevatte v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1975-02-25· cited 75×
- Shoemaker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1962-05-01· cited 68×
- Aubrey Dennis Adams, Jr. v. Richard L. Dugger, Robert ButterworthEleventh Circuit· 1987-04-23· cited 67×
- Robert Sawyer v. Robert H. Butler, Sr., Warden, Louisiana State PenitentiaryFifth Circuit· 1989-08-15· cited 63×
- Coppolino v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-11-08· cited 59×
- Abu-Jamal v. HornThird Circuit· 2008-03-27· cited 56×
- Blackwell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-05-10· cited 48×
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1964-03-06· cited 34×
- Gibbs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-01-06· cited 31×
- Reddick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-10-05· cited 29×
- Reis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-06-01· cited 28×
- Roach v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2009-04-23· cited 27×
- Michael Gordon Reynolds v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2018-04-05· cited 25×
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1976-08-13· cited 19×
- Collins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-03-15· cited 19×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-06-15· cited 157×
- Newton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1884-06-15· cited 52×
- Shattuck v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court· 1859-05-15· cited 30×
- Rice v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1895-01-15· cited 22×
- Witter v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court· 1855-11-30· cited 17×
- Mershon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1873-11-15· cited 16×
- Manly v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1875-11-15· cited 14×
- Goldsby v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1862-05-15· cited 13×
- Purvis v. FrinkSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-01-15· cited 8×
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1916-08-01· cited 8×
- State v. FullertonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1901-12-02· cited 8×
- Shaw v. HamiltonIndiana Supreme Court· 1858-05-27· cited 8×
- State v. GrinsteadCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1900-07-11· cited 5×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1896-01-22· cited 5×
- Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1912-01-15· cited 4×
- Jackson v. SandmanNew York Supreme Court· 1892-05-09· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.