Skip to main content

Blackwell v. State

Citations

  • 736 A.2d 971
  • 1999 Del. LEXIS 297
  • 1999 WL 731597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial court’s failure to advise defendant he would not have been able to drive for more than two years was harmless when he was informed that he faced a fifteen-year mandatory-minimum term of incarceration
  • holding trial court’s failure to advise defendant he would not have been able to drive for more than two years was harmless when he was informed that he faced a fifteen-year mandatory-minimum term of incarceration
  • “A motion to withdraw a guilty plea is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court.”
  • “A motion to withdraw a guilty plea is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court Generally, the denial of such a motion is reviewable only for abuse of discretion.”
  • “After sentencing, a motion to withdraw a guilty plea constitutes a collateral attack against the conviction and is subject to the requirements of Rule 61, including its bars of procedural default.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Holland, Hartnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.